Photolab 5) demolishing/sharpening techonlogy, it’s a good thing and I might buy it. So if PhotoRAW uses the latest technology (i.e. Therefore I need it as stand alone versions. Thank you! (Unfortunately?) I use Capture One I think current releaes of PureRAW and PhotoLab are contain the same denoising engine, even though the version numbering is different. You can export from PhotoLab to Lightroom, I'm not sure if it works the other way around. With that said, I think it depends on your computers performance. I found PureRAW to take longer on my computer. Is PureRAW any faster in processing images than Denoise? To those that does a direct side-by-side comparison, is there a noticeable difference in the processing time between the two? Thanks! But the processing time is a little long for my taste. I am actually happy with how Topaz Denoise performs. I think current releases of PureRAW and PhotoLab contain the same denoising engine, even though the version numbering is different.įilmPack is also pretty nice in my opinion (avaiable as Lightroom plugin I think too) as it adds a couple extra sliders to PhotoLab.
You can export directly from PhotoLab to Lightroom, I'm not sure if it works the other way around (but you can fall back to "manual" export via generated file). I meant does its de-noising and sharpening function equal that of Photolab 4 or 5? Maybe I should have articulated more clearly what I mean It just does de-noise and sharpening, and is used before you do anything else to the images. I don't know it firsthand, but that's what they say on their page:ĭoes this DXO also work as a stand-alone-software? I suppose it’s not integrated into Capture One, so working as a stand-alone-software would be crucial for me.Īnd one more question: Does the current version of DXO PureRAW equal Photolab 4 or 5 in its functionality?īecause if it’s only 4, it might be better to wait for a new version. you only get updates in the first year after purchase? What about Topas then? Do they also do the same, i.e.
0 kommentar(er)
